🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension caused by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been defused. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: another massive barrage of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the outgoing year. By day, diplomatic battles are waged: optimistic declarations are released from different nations. Immense energy is expended on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, military action persists as the primary tool for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's exposure was revealed. Ukraine is able to track rocket firings from Russian territory, a capability enabled by current data. From vantage locations, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to intercept incoming guided weapons roared overhead – modern combat jets delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Moments later, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons activated: defensive missiles deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, presumably supplied through partner states. Every firing creates sudden vibrations, shaking the windows. The instant of fear quickly gives way to grim resignation: maybe the approaching threat won't hit its mark this time, preventing destruction from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a heavy machine gun engaged a drone somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – most likely allied-provided weaponry. Sadly, the bullets missed the opposing UAV – it maintained course toward its target.

With pauses, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the morning news: seven people killed, destruction and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still maintained normal activities – enduring hostilities. But those full day illustrated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a need that regional partners are clearly incapable to substitute in the near term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from Washington generated strong feelings, controversy and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from American administration adheres to the same pattern: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, succeeds in resisting. They manage the tension but never actually secure success. This cycle will, no doubt, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the whole story. American leadership operates on a assumption familiar among international relations experts: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have lost on the battlefield. The White House believes that it is impossible to force Russia to abandon the areas that it currently occupies in Ukraine's south or east.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, Washington does little to deter Moscow, through statements or actions, from believing that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its favour in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Moscow is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its partners are approaching exhaustion. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be numerous efforts to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, progressively conceding people and territory but averting a entire defensive failure until situations evolve in its advantage.

Present Conditions

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: political desires to negotiate peace and achieve global acclaim, and the government's twin challenges – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their attention does not switch to homefront challenges. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after current events, it remains highly unlikely that this will modify their basic position.

These conflicting dynamics are influencing discussions.

Assessment and Future

It took a just a single week to terminate the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect specific hesitation to modify developments, if they remain united and strengthen their defence capabilities at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the predictable period, largely rely on sustained allied backing.